Written by Miriad with AI assistance and checked against the sources at the end. Marketing and office practice, not ethics advice: your state bar's rules decide.
TL;DR: Good law firm website copy answers the questions a prospective client asks at the first call: is this my kind of problem, how does it work, what does it cost, what happens next. It describes process and experience, not outcomes. Past results, testimonials and specialist titles are where the advertising rules bite, so write those parts last and check them hardest.
A prospective client lands on an employment lawyer's page at eleven at night, two days after being let go. The page opens with "Aggressive. Experienced. Results-driven." and a list of settlements. None of it answers the question they have: do I have a case, and what would working with you look like?
Writing a practice area page is mostly about that question, and about not answering it with a promise. This article is part of our small law firm marketing guide and covers the words on the page; the structure around them is in law firm website templates.
What does a prospective client want from a practice area page?
A prospective client wants to know four things: whether you handle their kind of matter, how the process runs, how fees work, and how to start. They are rarely comparing adjectives. A page that answers those four questions plainly, in their words rather than legal terms, does more work than any slogan.
The simplest research method is your own intake. Write down the first three questions people ask on the phone for each practice area, word for word, for a few weeks. Those questions become the page's subheadings. They are also the phrases people type into search engines and ask AI assistants, which is why plain, question-shaped copy tends to be the copy that gets quoted.
Then answer each one generally. "How long does an uncontested divorce take in this county?" can be answered with the steps, the filing points and the factors that change timing, without saying how long their divorce will take. That distinction, general information versus a prediction about a specific matter, is the core of the whole job.
How do you write about results without promising outcomes?
Write about how you work, not what you win. Describe the process, the decisions a client will face and how you communicate. If you mention past results at all, the advertising rules require care: a truthful result can still mislead if it creates an unjustified expectation for the next client.
The rule text is short. Minnesota's Rule 7.1, a state version of the ABA Model Rule structure, bars false or misleading communications, and a truthful statement can still be misleading, for example when past results create an unjustified expectation that other clients will get the same (Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 7.1, accessed 2026). Many states add their own requirements on results and testimonials, including disclaimers, so check your state bar's text.
Here are rewrites we use as a pattern:
| Instead of | Write |
|---|---|
| "We win custody cases." | "We prepare custody cases for hearing from the first meeting, so you know what the court will look at." |
| "Maximum compensation for your injury." | "We explain how damages are assessed in this state and what evidence matters." |
| "Record of success in DUI defence." | "We review the stop, the testing and the paperwork in every DUI matter." |
| "Fast, stress-free probate." | "Here are the probate steps, what you need to bring, and where delays usually come from." |
The right-hand column is longer and less exciting. It is also more useful, and it is what a careful reader wants before calling.
What words cause trouble on a law firm website?
The words that cause trouble are claims of specialisation, superlatives, implied outcomes, and testimonials that suggest a result. "Specialist" and "certified" need the certifying organisation named. Comparisons with other lawyers and statements about results need the same care as any claim you would have to prove.
From the Rule 7.2 text: a lawyer may not state or imply certification as a specialist unless the certifying organisation is identified, and every communication must include the name and contact details of at least one responsible lawyer or firm (Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 7.2, accessed 2026). In practice that means "focused on", "concentrating in" or "my practice is limited to" are safer phrasings than "specialist", unless you hold a recognised certification and name it.
Testimonials are a separate risk. Under the FTC's 2024 final rule, fake reviews and testimonials, including AI-generated ones, are banned, as are undisclosed insider reviews (FTC, 2024). A real testimonial can still imply a result, which brings it back under Rule 7.1, and quoting a client's words can raise confidentiality questions. Many small firms simply link to their Google reviews instead of curating client testimonials on the site.
How can AI help draft the copy safely?
AI can draft practice area copy safely because the input is your knowledge of the practice, not client files. Give it your intake questions, your process notes and your fee model, ask for plain language, then review every sentence for accuracy and for implied outcomes. Never paste a client's story to make the page "more real".
8am lists blog drafts, About pages, translated web pages and marketing emails among AI uses for law firm marketing, with a warning not to put sensitive client data into consumer-grade tools (8am, 2025). The CCBE guide for European lawyers makes the same two points from the ethics side: keep confidential data out without safeguards, and verify outputs before use (CCBE, 2025).
Example (illustrative, not a real case): A solo estate-planning lawyer wants a new page on trusts. She gives the AI tool her notes: the five questions clients ask at the first meeting, the steps she follows, her flat fee structure in words, and the counties she covers. She adds one instruction: "Do not predict outcomes, do not use the word specialist, do not invent statistics or cite law I have not given you." The first draft includes a sentence saying a trust "avoids probate in every case". She deletes it, because it is not true for every client and it is the kind of statement Rule 7.1 is about. She then checks the two statutory references against the code itself, adds her name, bar admission and office phone at the foot of the page, and publishes.
The last check matters more than the prompt. In Mata v. Avianca the problem was not using AI but filing citations nobody had verified (Mata v. Avianca, 2023). On a website the stakes are lower, but an invented statute on a practice page misleads exactly the readers you want to help.
What should you check before a practice area page goes live?
Before a page goes live, check five things: every statement of law is accurate and current, nothing predicts an outcome, specialist wording is compliant, a responsible lawyer and contact details appear, and no client could recognise themselves. Read it once as a lawyer and once as the anxious person searching at night.
The checklist we use:
- Law. Every statute, deadline and procedure checked against the original source, with the date you checked it.
- Outcomes. No sentence that a reader could take as a prediction for their matter.
- Titles. "Specialist" or "certified" only with the certifying organisation named.
- Responsibility. A named lawyer or the firm, with contact details, on the page.
- Confidentiality. No detail that identifies a client, even without a name.
- Next step. One clear call to action: phone, form or booking.
Put the date of the last review at the foot of the page. It reminds you to recheck the law, and it tells the reader the page is maintained. The same review habit carries over to email marketing for a law firm, where each update is a small practice area page in the inbox. The wider plan is in the small law firm marketing guide.
If you want a fixed order of work for this kind of page, from collecting client questions to the final edit, the Copywriting Pack is built around it. Get notified when it launches.
FAQ
Can a law firm website mention past case results?
It depends on your state. Under the Model Rules structure, a truthful statement about past results can still be misleading if it creates an unjustified expectation for other clients, and several states require disclaimers or limit how results are presented. Many small firms describe their process and experience instead. If you include results, check your state bar's rules first.
Can I call myself a specialist on my website?
Only if you are certified by an organisation your state recognises, and the claim names that organisation. Rule 7.2 in Model Rules states requires this. Without certification, phrasing such as "my practice is focused on" or "limited to" describes your work without implying a certification you do not hold.
Is it acceptable to use AI to write my practice area pages?
Yes, if the input is your own knowledge and not client information, and if you review every sentence before publishing. AI drafts quickly but can invent statutes, overstate certainty or slip in promises. You remain responsible for every statement on the page, exactly as if you had written it yourself.
How long should a practice area page be?
Long enough to answer the questions a prospective client asks at the first call, and no longer. For most practice areas that means a plain opening, the common questions, the process, fees and a next step. Padding a page with generic text does not help readers or search engines; specific answers do.
Sources
- Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes, "Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 7.1", accessed 2026. https://revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/rule/prcond-7.1/
- Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes, "Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 7.2", accessed 2026. https://revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/rule/prcond-7.2/
- U.S. Federal Trade Commission, "FTC Announces Final Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials", 2024-08-14. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/08/federal-trade-commission-announces-final-rule-banning-fake-reviews-testimonials
- 8am, "Ten More AI Use Cases for Lawyers: Marketing, Management, Arbitration", 2025-10-03. https://www.8am.com/blog/ten-more-ai-use-cases-lawyers-marketing-management-arbitration/
- CCBE, "CCBE guide on the use of generative AI by lawyers", 2025-10-02. https://www.advokatforeningen.no/contentassets/185dd73ac1e14031ac016b1567e4b7a6/ccbe-guide-on-the-use-of-the-use-of-generative-ai-for-lawyers.pdf
- U.S. District Court S.D.N.Y., "Mata v. Avianca, Inc., Opinion and Order on Sanctions", 2023-06-22. https://www.nhd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/Mata-v-Avianca-sanctions-order.PDF